【周海天】“經學現代化”的歷一包養經驗史變革與新范式的能夠性

requestId:68518650a5be84.59202021.

The historical changes of “Study Modernization” and the ability of new paradigms

Author: Zhou Haitian

Source: “Confucius Research” No. 1, 2023

Abstract: From the May Fourth Movement to the present, the process of “Study Modernization”Providing Internet Motors has always been accompanied by the researcher’s response to the impact of Oriental Theory. However, the misreading application of Oriental theory has worn the “study modernization” process: the “true meaning” during the May Fourth Movement overturned the ruling position of school and produced two problems that still existed today: on the one hand, school is regarded as a research and technical science; on the other hand, school is defined as a civilized disguise that certifies itself in accordance with the laws. The academic research in the new era should trace, settle down and develop the original positioning of academic research. Based on this, a future academic research paradigm is discussed. Through “self-inflection”, learning as science, learning as politics, ethics and learning as history becomes a differentiated unity in science.

Author introduction: Baocai.comZhou Haitian, associate professor in the Department of Chinese Studies in Shanghai, aims to compare philosophy between Chinese and Western culture.

In recent years, the revival of traditional civilization has promoted a new wave of “national passion”. The so-called “national learning” is the crystallization of the “translation”, “notation”, “notation”, “disclosure” and “original meaning” by interpreters in the past, and the development of learning is presented in the commentary of classics and their annotation.

The establishment of academic thinking cannot be separated from the perspective of the past solvers’ understanding and explanation of the problems in classics. Therefore, the replacement of new data in the new era must be closely related to the actual situation. In today’s language situation, what attitude should we treat “modernization of learning”? This article will discuss this.

1. The separation of “historical” under the influence of the “realistic meaning” thought

The thinking of the May Fourth Movement, such as Money Xuantong, Jian Jian and Hu Yang, introduced the concept of “scientific” in common meaning. From the perspective of building a scientific system, the science they understand includes “modern”, “system” and “factual”, but its focus is “realistic”, which is also the classical expression of the “strike-reaction” form called by american Han scholar Fongqing in modern Chinese academic circles. By bringing the concept of oriental style into the study of academic research, the “May 4th” period thoughters tried to find their fair position in the “New Civilization Movement” tide as a traditional learning from the beginning, and then achieve the goal of “opposing all old civilizations”. This reality can be traced back to the “Ancient History Discussion” which was born after the May 4th Movement.School. The representative figures of the “Ancient History Distinguishing School” are Money Xuantong and Guijian. Although their concept of “distinguishing the ancients” was influenced by the modern literary scholar Kang Youwei’s “discern” method of “discern” with Cui Xing, the “Qian and Jiajia School”, the learners of the “Ancient History Discern School” did not just follow the path of modern literary scholars, that is, deny ancient literature learning through “discern”, but The experiment transcends the division between Han and Song dynasties and modern Chinese literature, and introduces the concepts and methods of modern history to change the systemic changes in learning, just as Jade said in “Ancient History Discussion”:

The learning of old scholars and men is called historical lyrics. This is what it calls a systemic system of books, not scientific systems. He does not understand the system of science, so he despises the comparative and comparative matters, and regards them as a pure view. Each of them adheres to the walls of their homes and does not want to investigate the understanding of things. [1]

In this case, the consultant just regards “science” as equals “facts”:

Now there are scientific methods. , then the subsequent academics should directly be based on things, and are there any obstacles to homeschooling? [2]

The condition of modern literary learning to “distinguish the ancients” is to recognize the position of “distinguishing the ancients” in the “historical collection” to the other three, and the thinking of the “ancient history school” represented by the “conclusion of history” is based on the “history of the East”Baobao.comTalk theoriesThe “Talk theories” not only denies the modern and ancient literature studies, but also forms a serious consequence, that is, it divides the traditional relationship between history, history and politics. In “Ancient History” just said in “About Ancient History” about the relationship between “history” and “Zishi”: “Zishi is the data of political history, and Zishi is the data of thinking history. ”【3】

In fact, the students during the May Fourth Movement period were widely influenced by the thinking of “God teachers” and “Chairman teachers”, but the major thinking teachers are concerned about “scientific大官网大官网发” is the connotation of “realistic meaning”. Therefore, the huge and empty concept of “science” did not fail to complete the reconstruction of the system of the structure during the May Fourth period. When understanding what is the “system of science”, the thinkers in the May Fourth period misunderstood the philosophical meaning of “science” in the East, and only equate “science” to “fact” and “cause and effectinclusive law”. German philosopher Martin Heidegger pointed out in his book “The Unrestricted Essence of the Humans”:

“Science” in Eastern Philosophy refers to In addition, the “law of cause and effect” must be established under the conditions that ultimately follow. However, in the May Fourth Movement, “science” is often simply interpreted as a “veritable meaning” focusing on “experience fact” and “law of cause and effect”.

But the proverb has their own insights on what natural science is (a pure and simple explanation). They believe it contains two things: first, to determine the facts; second, to construct rules. Facts are directly determined by sensory perception. The law is based on the naming method to combine these facts. Under this influence, a new historical compilation emerged, which can be called a historical compilation of the practical theory of 大官网. [5]

This analysis of Colin Wude accurately points out the shortcomings of “realistic theory”, that is, to simply determine that natural science is only determined by sensory facts and combine this kind of knowledge based on the narrative method. As far as the impact is concerned, the phenomenon of “historical separation” influenced by the “actualism” during the May Fourth Movement period also prevents this problem from occurring, that is, the study in the “actualism” field has become an empty name imagined and constructed. The content and life in the study – “history” has become an internal lies in the The existence of the classification of academic subjects is therefore, the study that focuses on the “study of heaven and man” has been downgraded to the quarrel between “academics”, “politics” and “economics”. In other words, the relationship between “infinite and infinite” among “infinite” and &#